25.1. Introduction
The electrostatic force is a conservative force. This means that the work it
does on a particle depends only on the initial and final position of the
particle, and not on the path followed. With each conservative force, a
potential energy can be associated. The introduction of the potential energy
is useful since it allows us to apply conservation of mechanical energy which
simplifies the solution of a large number of problems.
The potential energy U associated with a conservative force F is defined in
the following manner
(25.1)
where U(P
0) is the potential energy at the reference position
P
0 (usually U(P
0) = 0) and the path integral is along any
convenient path connecting P
0 and P
1. Since the force F
is conservative, the integral in eq.(25.1) will not depend on the path chosen.
If the work W is positive (force and displacement pointing in the same
direction) the potential energy at P
1 will be smaller than the
potential energy at P
0. If energy is conserved, a decrease in the
potential energy will result in an increase of the kinetic energy. If the work
W is negative (force and displacement pointing in opposite directions) the
potential energy at P
1 will be larger than the potential energy at
P
0. If energy is conserved, an increase in the potential energy
will result in an decrease of the kinetic energy. If In electrostatic problems
the reference point P
0 is usually chosen to correspond to an
infinite distance, and the potential energy at this reference point is taken to
be equal to zero. Equation (25.1) can then be rewritten as:
(25.2)
To describe the potential energy associated with a charge distribution the
concept of the
electrostatic potential V is introduced. The
electrostatic potential V at a given position is defined as the potential
energy of a test particle divided by the charge q of this object:
(25.3)
In the last step of eq.(25.3) we have assumed that the reference point
P
0 is taken at infinity, and that the electrostatic potential at
that point is equal to 0. Since the force per unit charge is the electric
field (see Chapter 23), eq. (25.3) can be rewritten as
(25.4)
The unit of electrostatic potential is the
volt (V), and 1 V = 1
J/C = 1 Nm/C. Equation (25.4) shows that as the unit of the electric field
we can also use V/m.
A common used unit for the energy of a particle is the electron-volt (eV)
which is defined as the change in kinetic energy of an electron that travels
over a potential difference of 1 V. The electron-volt can be related to the
Joule via eq.(25.3). Equation (25.3) shows that the change in energy of an
electron when it crosses over a 1 V potential difference is equal to 1.6
. 10
-19 J and we thus conclude that 1 eV = 1.6
. 10
-19 J
25.2. Calculating the Electrostatic Potential
A charge q is moved from P
0 to P
1 in the vicinity of
charge q' (see Figure 25.1). The electrostatic potential at P
1 can
be determined using eq. (25.4) and evaluating the integral along the path shown
in Figure 25.1. Along the circular part of the path the electric field and the
displacement are perpendicular, and the change in the electrostatic potential
will be zero. Equation (25.4) can therefore be rewritten as
(25.5)
If the charge q' is positive, the potential increases with a decreasing
distance r. The electric field points away from a positive charge, and we
conclude that the electric field points from regions with a high electrostatic
potential towards regions with a low electrostatic potential.
Figure 25.1. Path followed by charge q between P0 and
P1.
From the definition of the electrostatic potential in terms of
the potential energy (eq.(25.3)) it is clear that the potential energy of a
charge q under the influence of the electric field generated by charge q' is
given by
(25.6)
Example: Problem 25.21
A total charge Q is distributed uniformly along a straight rod of
length L. Find the potential at point P at a distance h from the midpoint of
the rod (see Figure 25.2).
The potential at P due to a small segment of the rod, with length dx and
charge dQ, located at the position indicated in Figure 25.3 is given by
(25.7)
The charge dQ of the segment is related to the total charge Q and length L
(25.8)
Combining equations (25.7) and (25.8) we obtain the following expression for
dV:
(25.9)
Figure 25.2. Problem 25.21.
Figure 25.3. Solution of Problem 25.21.
The total potential at P can be obtained by summing over all
small segments. This is equivalent to integrating eq.(25.9) between x = - L/2
and x = L/2.
(25.10)
Example: Problem 25.15
An alpha particle with a kinetic energy of 1.7 x 10
-12 J is
shot directly towards a platinum nucleus from a very large distance. What will
be the distance of closest approach ? The electric charge of the alpha
particle is 2e and that of the platinum nucleus is 78e. Treat the alpha
particle and the nucleus as spherical charge distributions and disregard the
motion of the nucleus.
The initial mechanical energy is equal to the kinetic energy of the alpha
particle
(25.11)
Due to the electric repulsion between the alpha particle and the platinum
nucleus, the alpha particle will slow down. At the distance of closest
approach the velocity of the alpha particle is zero, and thus its kinetic
energy is equal to zero. The total mechanical energy at this point is equal to
the potential energy of the system
(25.12)
where q
1 is the charge of the alpha particle, q
2 is the
charge of the platinum nucleus, and d is the distance of closest approach.
Applying conservation of mechanical energy we obtain
(25.13)
The distance of closest approach can be obtained from eq.(25.13)
(25.14)
25.3. The Electrostatic Field as a Conservative Field
The electric field is a conservative field since the electric force is a
conservative force. This implies that the path integral
(25.15)
between point P
0 and point P
1 is independent of the path
between these two points. In this case the path integral for any closed path
will be zero:
(25.16)
Equation (25.16) can be used to prove an interesting theorem:
" within a closed, empty cavity inside a homogeneous conductor, the electric
field is exactly zero ".
Figure 25.4. Cross section of cavity inside spherical
conductor.
Figure 25.4 shows the cross section of a possible cavity inside
a spherical conductor. Suppose there is a field inside the conductor and one
of the field lines is shown in Figure 25.4. Consider the path integral of
eq.(25.16) along the path indicated in Figure 25.4. In Chapter 24 it was shown
that the electric field within a conductor is zero. Thus the contribution of
the path inside the conductor to the path integral is zero. Since the
remaining part of the path is chosen along the field line, the direction of the
field is parallel to the direction of the path, and therefore the path integral
will be non-zero. This obviously violates eq.(25.16) and we must conclude that
the field inside the cavity is equal to zero (in this case the path integral is
of course equal to zero).
25.4. The Gradient of the Electrostatic Potential
The electrostatic potential V is related to the electrostatic field E. If the
electric field E is known, the electrostatic potential V can be obtained using
eq.(25.4), and vice-versa. In this section we will discuss how the electric
field E can be obtained if the electrostatic potential is known.
Figure 25.5. Calculation of the electric field E.
Consider the two points shown in Figure 25.5. These two
nearly identical positions are separated by an infinitesimal distance dL. The
change in the electrostatic potential between P
1 and P
2
is given by
(25.17)
where the angle [theta] is the angle between the direction of the electric
field and the direction of the displacement (see Figure 25.5). Equation
(25.17) can be rewritten as
(25.18)
where E
L indicates the component of the electric field along the
L-axis. If the direction of the displacement is chosen to coincide with the
x-axis, eq.(25.18) becomes
(25.19)
For the displacements along the y-axis and z-axis we obtain
(25.20)
(25.21)
The total electric field E can be obtained from the electrostatic potential V
by combining equations (25.19), (25.20), and (25.21):
(25.22)
Equation (25.22) is usually written in the following form
(25.23)
where --V is the gradient of the potential V.
In many electrostatic problems the electric field of a certain charge
distribution must be evaluated. The calculation of the electric field can be
carried out using two different methods:
1. the electric field can be calculated by applying Coulomb's law and vector
addition of the contributions from all charges of the charge distribution.
2. the total electrostatic potential V can be obtained from the algebraic sum
of the potential due to all charges that make up the charge distribution, and
subsequently using eq.(25.23) to calculate the electric field E.
In many cases method 2 is simpler since the calculation of the electrostatic
potential involves an algebraic sum, while method 1 relies on the vector sum.
Example: Problem 25.32
In some region of space, the electrostatic potential is the following
function of x, y, and z:
(25.24)
where the potential is measured in volts and the distances in meters. Find the
electric field at the points x = 2 m, y = 2 m.
The x, y and z components of the electric field E can be obtained from the
gradient of the potential V (eq.(25.23)):
(25.25)
(25.26)
(25.27)
Evaluating equations (25.25), (25.26), and (25.27) at x = 2 m and y = 2 m
gives
(25.28)
(25.29)
(25.30)
Thus
(25.31)
Example: Problem 25.36
An annulus (a disk with a hole) made of paper has an outer radius R and
an inner radius R/2 (see Figure 25.6). An amount Q of electric charge is
uniformly distributed over the paper.
a) Find the potential as a function of the distance on the axis of the
annulus.
b) Find the electric field on the axis of the annulus.
We define the x-axis to coincide with the axis of the annulus (see Figure
25.7). The first step in the calculation of the total electrostatic potential
at point P due to the annulus is to calculate the electrostatic potential at P
due to a small segment of the annulus. Consider a ring with radius r and width
dr as shown in Figure 25.7. The electrostatic potential dV at P generated by
this ring is given by
(25.32)
where dQ is the charge on the ring. The charge density [rho] of the annulus is
equal to
(25.33)
Figure 25.6. Problem 25.36.
Using eq. (25.33) the charge dQ of the ring can be calculates
(25.34)
Substituting eq.(25.34) into eq.(25.32) we obtain
(25.35)
The total electrostatic potential can be obtained by integrating eq.(25.35)
over the whole annulus:
(25.36)
Figure 25.7. Calculation of electrostatic potential in Problem
25.36.
Due to the symmetry of the problem, the electric field will be
directed along the x-axis. The field strength can be obtained by applying
eq.(25.23) to eq.(25.36):
(25.37)
Since the electrostatic field and the electrostatic potential are related we
can replace the field lines by so called
equipotential surfaces.
Equipotential surfaces are defined as surfaces on which each point has the same
electrostatic potential. The component of the electric field parallel to this
surface must be zero since the change in the potential between all points on
this surface is equal to zero. This implies that the direction of the electric
field is perpendicular to the equipotential surfaces.
25.5. The Potential and Field of a Dipole
Figure 25.8 shows an electric dipole located along the z-axis. It consists of
two charges + Q and - Q, separated by a distance L. The electrostatic
potential at point P can be found by summing the potentials generated by each
of the two charges:
(25.38)
Figure 25.8. The electric dipole.
If the point P is far away from the dipole (r >> L) we
can make the approximation that r
1 and r
2 are parallel.
In this case
(25.39)
and
(25.40)
The electrostatic potential at P can now be rewritten as
(25.41)
where p is the dipole moment of the charge distribution. The electric field of
the dipole can be obtained from eq.(25.41) by taking the gradient (see
eq.(25.23)).
No comments:
Post a Comment