Talha's Physics Academy
Wheatstone Bridge & Balanced Condition
Video Lecture
Watch the complete video lecture below to understand the Wheatstone Bridge configuration and step-by-step mathematical derivation for its balanced condition.
Wheatstone Bridge
Circuit Explanation
Consider four resistors connected in a bridge network between common junctions $a$, $b$, $c$, and $d$:
- A voltage source (battery) and key $K_1$ are connected between junctions $a$ and $c$.
- A galvanometer of resistance $G$ and key $K_2$ are connected between junctions $b$ and $d$.
When keys $K_1$ and $K_2$ are closed, current flows through the circuit. The magnitudes of the four resistors are adjusted until no current flows through the galvanometer ($I_g = 0$). Under this condition, the bridge is referred to as a balanced Wheatstone bridge.
Derivation of Balanced Condition
Let the total current supplied by the cell be $I$. At junction $a$, the current splits into $I_1$ (flowing through branch $abd$) and $(I - I_1)$ (flowing through branch $acd$). The current passing through the galvanometer is denoted as $I_g$.
Applying Kirchhoff's Second Law (KVL) to closed loop $ABDA$:
$$I_1 P + I_g G - (I - I_1) R = 0 \quad \text{--- (i)}$$
Applying Kirchhoff's Second Law (KVL) to closed loop $BCDB$:
$$(I_1 - I_g) Q - (I - I_1 + I_g) S - I_g G = 0 \quad \text{--- (ii)}$$
Condition for Balance
When the bridge is balanced, the galvanometer shows no deflection, meaning the galvanometer current is zero ($I_g = 0$). Substituting $I_g = 0$ into equations (i) and (ii):
From equation (i):
$$I_1 P - (I - I_1) R = 0$$
$$I_1 P = (I - I_1) R \quad \text{--- (iii)}$$
From equation (ii):
$$I_1 Q - (I - I_1) S = 0$$
$$I_1 Q = (I - I_1) S \quad \text{--- (iv)}$$
Dividing equation (iii) by equation (iv):
$$\frac{I_1 P}{I_1 Q} = \frac{(I - I_1) R}{(I - I_1) S}$$
$$\frac{P}{Q} = \frac{R}{S}$$
Conclusion: This expression gives the condition for a balanced Wheatstone bridge. If the values of three resistors are known, the magnitude of the fourth unknown resistor can be precisely determined using this relation.

No comments:
Post a Comment